Incident Library — Graded Troubleshooting
Sixteen optical-transport incidents, each played the way a real call goes: you get a brief and nothing else. You gather directional evidence, you rank hypotheses, you commit to a root cause and a next action — and only then does the engine reveal whether your reasoning held up. It grades not just the answer but the method: did you scope the blast radius, did you get the discriminating reading before committing, did you avoid a destructive move before you localised, and did you do it efficiently. The point is not to memorise sixteen answers; it is to drill the habit that solves the seventeenth.
- Scope the blast radius. One wavelength, one span, or one site? This single question routes everything after it — service/transponder vs fiber/line-system vs power/facility.
- Gather directional evidence. Faults are directional. Compare local Rx against remote Tx, presence against quality, near-end against far-end — until you find the hop where healthy becomes broken.
- Rank hypotheses. Hold several candidates at once and let the evidence sort them, rather than falling in love with the first guess.
- Choose the next action / escalation. The correct move is often get one more reading or hand back across the demarc — not swap the card.
- Write the root-cause report. Name the fault, the evidence that proves it, and the fix.
The incident engine
Pick a case, work it, and get a graded scorecard. Your progress ticks the checklist below as you close cases correctly.
How this is graded
Each case is scored out of 100 across four dimensions, then mapped to a letter grade. The weighting deliberately rewards method over luck — you can name the right root cause and still lose points if you guessed it without the discriminating evidence, or if you reached for a destructive action first.
| Dimension | Weight | What earns the points |
|---|---|---|
| Root cause | 45 | You selected the correct root cause. This is necessary but not sufficient — the other 55 points police how you got there. |
| Discriminating evidence | 30 | Before committing, you scoped the blast radius and gathered the specific reading that separates the real cause from its look-alikes (e.g. comparing local Rx to remote Tx to fix direction). |
| Safety / sequencing | 15 | You did not take a destructive or hardware action (RMA a card, pull a fiber, force a protection switch) before localising the fault. Acting blind is penalised even when the guess happens to be right. |
| Efficiency | 10 | You gathered evidence close to the case's optimal step count. Thrashing through every action or committing on too little both cost points. |
Letter bands: A 90+, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. PASS/AMBER/FAIL colour cues flag each dimension at a glance: green = clean, amber = did it but late or inefficient, red = missed or unsafe.
Case progress
These tick automatically as you close each case correctly in the engine above; you can also mark them by hand.